While it’s no surprise that the justice system is a myriad of diversity, countless sources claim the judicial branch is corrupt.
This enticing perspective can be followed up by a great deal of support.
Studies show that approximately one out of one hundred U.S. adults have either been incarcerated or convicted of a crime. Overcriminalization has accumulated a surplus of wealth gaps. The Brennan Central support states, “Criminal convictions set people up for a lifetime of diminished earnings, helping perpetuate poverty while fueling racial, health and economic inequality.” Several of these individuals also have families who are deeply affected by this, and in turn, suffer from the American legal system’s harsh penalties. On several accords, the annual earnings of formerly convicted citizens are drastically reduced for the rest of their lives.
Although arguments can be made against this topic, such as the claim that criminals deserve to be punished and justice shall be upheld. Moreover, crimes are not always as severe, and punishments are often overdone. Even a minor offense such as shoplifting can reduce annual earnings by 16%. That of which can detriment the difference between economic instability and inescapable poverty.
The crooked legal system could be fixed by lessening the penalties of minor offenses so as to not ruin the lives of poor Americans. Not only would this fix extreme wealth gaps, but it would limit the exceeding number of individuals struggling even further to provide for their families. Other opportunities should be provided to enforce criminals of minor offenses to start anew.
This predominant issue of wealth gaps and legal inequality is the struggle to provide for families. Children are more often than not harshly affected by their parents’ decisions. A crime is still a crime nonetheless and the convicted deserve to be punished for their actions, but the children and families of these people should not be harmed so severely.
